Allowed

Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2015CR. MISC./20914/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, husband of the accused victim, in a criminal case involving allegations under Section 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court directed the petitioner to execute bail bonds and produce sureties.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sheikhpura.

Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20914 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2014 Thana -BARBIGHA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== 1. Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav. Son of Nago Yadav. Resident of village - Balwapar, P.S.- Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashraf Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 01-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband of the victim has renewed his prayer for bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304B, 120/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Accusation is of killing the daughter of the informant after seven years of marriage for non-fulfillment of dowry demand and disposed of the dead body.

¶3

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.05.2014. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner vide Cr. Misc. No. 33598 of 2014 was disposed of on 12.01.2015 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after examination of informant.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20914 of 2015 (2) dt.01-07-2015

¶5

¶6

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the informant has been examined as P.W.-5, who has not supported the accusation. Moreover, from the materials on record, it appears that the marriage was performed more than seven years prior to the occurrence hence, this case does not come within the purview of Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Considering the above mentioned submission, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sheikhpura in connection with Barbigha P.S. Case No. 43 of 2014.

¶8

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶9

P.K./-

¶10

U T

Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binod Yadav @ Mangal Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Babu Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Mishra @ Pappu Mishra @ Pappu Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Suman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bipin Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Rai Vs The State Of Bihar