Allowed

Girjodhan Bind @ Girijodhan Bind @ Jundodhan Bind v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC8 Jul 2015CR. MISC./22361/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, husband of the complainant, in a dowry torture case. Bail conditions required a bond and surrender within 12 weeks pending verification of a compromise petition filed by the informant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to deposit of compromise petition.

Girjodhan Bind @ Girijodhan Bind @ Jundodhan Bind Vs State… — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22361 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -298 Year- 2014 Thana -NOORSARAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== 1. Girjodhan Bind @ Girijodhan Bind @ Jundodhan Bind S/o Hira Bind Resident of Village Jalalpur, P.S. Chandi, District Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Manju Devi D/o Pappu Jamadar Resident of Village Pathraura, P.S. Noorsaai, District Nalanda. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner being husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The basic accusation is of torture. A supplementary affidavit has been filed bringing on record Annexure-2 to the effect that informant has filed a petition before learned Court below to the effect that both sides have decided to part ways.

¶3

Learned counsel for the informant though admits that supplementary affidavit has been served to him by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner but he has no instruction in this regard.

¶4

Considering the present stand of the parties,

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22361 of 2015 (2) dt.08-07-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Noorsarao P.S. Case No. 298 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶8

The bail bonds of the petitioner will be accepted on verification of the submission of the compromise petition by the informant before learned Court below.

¶9

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶10

Shageer/-

¶11

U T

Girjodhan Bind @ Girijodhan Bind @ Jundodhan Bind v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girjodhan Bind @ Girijodhan Bind @ Jundodhan Bind v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar Yadav @ Ravindra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar Sharma and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bimla Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Bablu Mauar @ Bablu Lal Mauar @ Neeraj Kumar Mauar @ Neeraj Mauar Vs The State Of Bihar