Allowed

Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2015CR. MISC./21232/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order granted bail to a petitioner accused of theft (Section 379 IPC). The court required a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties but authorized cancellation if the petitioner commits further serious offences or defaults.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties; conditional liberty to cancel bail for further offences or default.

Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21232 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -237 Year- 2014 Thana -CHATOUNI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh Son of Naresh Prasad Kushwaha, Resident of village Pataura, Pachhiyari Tola, P.S. Mufassil Motihari, District- East Champaran at Motihari. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Sharan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. H.A.Khan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 07-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 12.11.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. On motorcycle being stolen the FIR was lodged against unknown. The petitioner confessed his guilt on his arrest. From the confession of co-accused it transpired that petitioner and co-accused committed the offence. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the recovery has not been made from the petitioner. The petitioner’s complicity also transpired from the CCTV

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21232 of 2015 (2) dt.07-07-2015

¶4

2/2

¶5

footage of the hotel where the motorcycle was parked. The investigation has already concluded.

¶6

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Sadar Motihari in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 237 of 2014.

¶7

Since the petitioner is accused in four other cases, the learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in some serious nature of offence or defaults for two consecutive occasions.

¶8

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶9

DKS/-

¶10

U T

Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gappu @ Gappu Kumar @ Shailesh Kumar @ Shailesh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivanand Tiwary @ Shiv Kumar Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Geeta Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhiya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar