Allowed

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jul 2015CR. MISC./12729/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application arising under sections 363/367A/120B IPC regarding the abduction of a minor, the High Court of Patna certified the petitioner's bail and directed his release on furnishing a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount to the MAGIC, Buxar.

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar Vs The State Of… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12729 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -253 Year- 2014 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR

¶4

====================================================== Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar Son of Sri Dadan Kamkar@ Dadan Kharwar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Nath Mishra(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 06-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 27.09.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 363/367A/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

The prosecution case is that on 17.09.2014 about 01:00 pm the grand-daughter of the informant Gita Kumari went to her friend's house namely Rekha Kumari and, thereafter, she went traceless. Subsequently, it was found that she had love affair with this petitioner and who used to talk with this petitioner through mobile which was detected by sister of the victim namely Asha Kumari. The victim is still traceless.

¶6

It is submitted by learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner that for the occurrence of 17.09.2014 the FIR was

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12729 of 2015 (3) dt.06-07-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

registered on 26.09.2014, though the petitioner was named in the FIR. From the materials collected during investigation and the petition filed by the informant before the learned court below, it is apparent that the petitioner, on the alleged date of occurrence, was at his place of employment in Hariyana. During investigation, the investigating agency has found that on 08.09.2014, 17.09.2014 and 18.09.2014, the petitioner and victim talked through mobile.

¶10

Learned APP for the State, after going through the case diary has submitted that neither identity of the mobile of the petitioner has been ascertained whether it was registered in his name nor his voice verification has been made. A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶11

Considering the nature of accusation, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Brahampur P.S. Case No.253 of 2014.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

Ashwini/-

¶14

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajeev Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Prafulla Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Brajesh Kumar @ Vikash Vs The State Of Bihar

Jitendra Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Basisth Rai Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Vinod Kumar Singh @ Bablu Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar