Allowed

Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Jul 2015CR. MISC./26585/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a criminal case arising from a land title dispute, releasing them subject to a bail bond and sureties within 12 weeks under Section 438 CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on anticipatory bail within 12 weeks with a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each and two sureties of like amount.

Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26585 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI TOWN District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== 1. Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar, Son of Ram Balak Poddar, 2. Ajad Sahni, Son of Satya Naryan Sahni Both Resdients of MohallaLohiya Nagar, PS.- Town, District- Begusarai. 3. Mangal Pandit, Son of Late Kulo Pandit, resident of Mohalla- Pokhariya, P.S.- Town, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Devi(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 07-07-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶4

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147,149,387,341,323,447,420,467,468,471,504,506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

The prosecution case is that the informant purchased 8 katha of land of Khata no. 203, khesra no. 319 in Mauza Suja vide registered sale deed on 21.11.1978. On 11.4.2015 when the informant went to start construction work then the accused persons including the petitioners abused and obstructed the construction work and demanded rupees ten lacs as extortion and due to assault

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26585 of 2015 (2) dt.07-07-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

the informant became unconscious.

¶9

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners claim to have purchased the land in question from Laddan Mian through sale deed and the same was mutated in favour of the petitioners and rent receipt was also granted. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶10

Considering the accusation in the background of dispute with regard to the title of the land in question, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Begusarai in connection with Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 185 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶11

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Anil/-

¶13

U T

Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindo Kumar @ Binod Poddar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Kamkar @ Shankar Kharwar@shankar kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Shivanand Tiwary @ Shiv Kumar Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Sah and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Geeta Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhiya and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Ashish Bhagat Vs The State Of Bihar