Allowed

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2015CR. MISC./44964/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, who had been in custody since August 2011 for alleged offences under Sections 307, 506 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act (subsequently Section 302 IPC was added). The release was ordered due to the prolonged custody and the unlikelihood of trial conclusion.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Sunil Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44964 of 2013

¶3

====================================================== Sunil Yadav S/O Surya Narayan Yadav Resident Of Village- Fatehpur, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04/ 02-09-2015 Petitioner has renewed his prayer for bail in a case initially registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. Subsequently, section 302 IPC was also added.

¶4

The fard-beyan is the statement of the victim is that the petitioner caused firearm injury to the informant Raj Kumar Mukhiya, who subsequently succumbed to the injuries.

¶5

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 26.08.2011 and there was dispute with regard to cutting of the branches of the tree alleged to have been fallen in the area of the

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44964 of 2013 (04) dt.02-09-2015

¶7

2/3

¶8

informant. It is further submitted that out of fourteen chargesheeted witnesses nine have been examined and the last witness P.W. 9 Rekha Kumari has been examined on 30.01.2014 and still five witnesses are left to be examined. This fact gets reflected from the report of learned 1^st Additional Sessions Judge, Saharsa dated 01.10.2014. It is further submitted that out of nine witnesses seven have gone hostile and there is no likelihood of trial being concluded and in the background of civil nature of dispute the accusation has been levelled.

¶9

A statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶10

Learned APP after going through the records does not controvert the contention of the learned counsel for thepetitioner.

¶11

Considering the fact that petitioner is languishing in custody since more than four years and the trial is not likelihood to be concluded, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Saharsa in connection with Sessions Trail No. 276 of 2011 arising out of Sonbarsa Raj (Kash Nagar O.P.) P.S. Case No. 70 of 2011.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44964 of 2013 (04) dt.02-09-2015

¶13

3/3

¶14

The learned trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he defaults for two consecutive occasions during trial.

¶15

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶16

DKS/U T

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hanshraj Singh @ Hansraj Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sarjeet Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Pandey @ Niraj Pandey @ Niraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Thakur Singh and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Hareram Mallah @ Hareram Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithlesh Yadav @ Mithlesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar