Allowed

Kamruddin @ Bilai @ Azad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2015CR. MISC./18203/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regarding a bail petition in cases under Explosive Substances Act and UAPA, the High Court observed that jail authorities failed to produce the petitioner before the trial court despite directions. Noting the delay, the court granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions of periodic attendance.

Kamruddin @ Bilai @ Azad Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.18203 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2012 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA ====================================================== 1. Kamruddin @ Bilai @ Azad Son of Late Md. Ayub Mian, Resident of Mohalla - Purani Bazar (Masaurhi P.s. Masaurhi District Patna). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 24-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 08-012012 in a case registered under Sections-4/5 of Explosive Substances Act, 17 CLA Act and Sections-15, 16 & 17 of Unlawful Prevention Activity Act on the accusation that in huge quantity, the explosive substances was recovered from the rented room of the petitioner. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this court in anticipation that the trial of the petitioner would be expedited by the concerned court but the report of learned trial court reveals that in spite of several directions, the jail authorities did not produce the petitioner before the court of Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-Ist, Gaya. The

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18203 of 2015 (3) dt.24-06-2015

¶4

2/2

¶5

aforesaid conduct of jail authorities goes to show that there is no possibility of conclusion of trial of the petitioner in near future. Moreover, having more or less similar allegation, co-accused, Abu Hanzala has already been granted privilege of bail by a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 10-05-2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16520 of 2012.

¶6

Accordingly, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Delha P.S. Case No. 05 of 2012 corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 37 of 2013 to the satisfaction of A.D.J. (F.T.C.-I), Gaya subject to condition that the petitioner shall attend the trial court, in person, on each and every date for the period of 9 months or till conclusion of the trial whichever is earlier and if, he fails to do so, on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶7

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶8

A.K.V./-

¶9

U T

Kamruddin @ Bilai @ Azad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamruddin @ Bilai @ Azad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girja Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Indal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakhindra Mochi @ Lakhindra Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Rafique Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithilesh Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Angad Noniya and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar