Partly allowed

Indal Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jun 2015CR. MISC./10092/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Miscellaneous petition filed by Indal Yadav and Chandrika Yadav seeking interim relief to prevent arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 413, 414, 420, 419, 467, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The High Court allowed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted; petitioners released on furnishing security bonds upon arrest or surrender within four weeks.

Indal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10092 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -532 Year- 2014 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== 1. Indal Yadav 2. Chandrika Yadav Both Sons of Rekha Yadav, Resident of Village - Gidha, P.S. - Chanpatia, District - West Champaran at Bettiah. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Hirday Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶3

4 23-06-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bettiah Town P.S.Case No. 532 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414, 420, 419, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code. Originally, petitioners were made accused in Chanpatia P.S.Case No.214 of 2014 on the ground that they had kept stolen vehicle but in course of investigation, it was found that the vehicle of the petitioners had been purchased from R.C.Enterprises, Motihari and on the aforesaid ground petitioners were granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10092 of 2015 (4) dt.23-06-2015

¶5

2/2

¶6

vide order dated 17.12.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44790 of 2014 in Chanpatia P.S.Case No.214 of 2014 but subsequently the documents of seized vehicle of Chanpatia P.S.Case No.214 of 2014 were sent for verification and then it was detected that the documents of seized vehicle of the aforesaid case were forged and fabricated.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that documents of the vehicle of the petitioners were never sent for verification which is evident from perusal of list enclosed with the first information report.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts and

¶9

circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-( ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah West Champaran in Bettiah Town P.S.Case No. 532 of 2014 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶10

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶11

Namita/U T

Indal Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indal Yadav and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suman Naut @ Suman @ Suman Kr. Khalipha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramyad Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Banti Ram Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Girja Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Lakhindra Mochi @ Lakhindra Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar