Allowed

Satyaprakash Kumar @ Tunnu Singh @ Satya Prakash Singh @ Tuna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC13 May 2015CR. MISC./15123/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving offences under IPC Sections 448, 353, 427, 504, and 506/34, subject to conditions and a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Disclosed a condition for anticipatory bail release on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties within 12 weeks.

Satyaprakash Kumar @ Tunnu Singh @ Satya Prakash Singh @… — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15123 of 2015 (2) dt.13-05-2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶3

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15123 of 2015

¶4

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -267 Year- 2014 Thana -ARWAL District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== 1. Satyaprakash Kumar @ Tunnu Singh @ Satya Prakash Singh @ Tuna Singh S/o Ramdil Singh 2. Ankit Kumar @ Jhunna Singh S/o Ramdil Singh Both are resident of village - Bahadurpur, P.S. Parsashi, District - Arwal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M.K.Nirala(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 13-05-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448,353,427,504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

It is alleged that the petitioner and three four unknown persons entered into the official chamber of Circle Officer, Arwal and started asking the informant in relation to measurement of a land and issuance of rent receipt. The accused persons also threatened the informant and smashed the official papers.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that for the occurrence of 8.12.2014 the FIR was registered on 9.12.2014 at 7 P.M. The accusation is omnibus and general

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15123 of 2015 (2) dt.13-05-2015

¶9

whereas the petitioner no. 2 lodged Arwal P.S. Case No. 266 of 2014 making accusation under sections 147,149,341,323,379,504 and 506 IPC against the informant.

¶10

Considering the omnibus and general accusation and the case lodged by petitioner no. 2 at earlier in point of time, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Jehanabad in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No.267 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶11

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Anil/-

¶13

U T

Satyaprakash Kumar @ Tunnu Singh @ Satya Prakash Singh @ Tuna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyaprakash Kumar @ Tunnu Singh @ Satya Prakash Singh @ Tuna Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chirkut Sahni @ Chirkut Sahani and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Shyam Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Singh @ Pinku Vs The State Of Bihar

Asha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Saheb Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantosh Ram @ Dipendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar