The Patna High Court dismissed a civil review petition for default because the petitioner failed to remove the defect specified in an earlier order despite prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.13 of 2013 (4) dt.18-02-2014
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.13 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21076 of 2012 ====================================================== The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary Registration &Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Nand Kishore Singh .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
|---|---|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 4 | 18-02-2014 None has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. |
| Despite order, dated 3.2.2014, the defect, in question, has not been removed. |
|
| In view of the above, this review petition stands dismissed for default. |
|
| (I. A. Ansari, J) | |
| A.I./- | (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) |
The State of Bihar Through The Secretary Registration & Ors.
Nand Kishore Singh
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
