====================================================== 1. The Union Of India, Through The Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi 2. The General Manager, E.C. Railway, Hajipur 3. The General Manager ( Personnel ), E.C. Railway, Hajipur 4. The Dy. C.P.O. ( Gaz. ), E.C. Railway, Hajipur 5. The Sr. D.P.O., E.C. Railway, Samastipur 6. The A.P.O., E.C. Railway, Samastipur .... .... Petitioners Versus Dr. Mrs. Monika Singh Wife Of Dr. D.S. Singh Permanent Resident Of Village - Korhar, P.O. And P.S. Bihta, District - Patna, Present Resident Of Opposite Tirhut Academy School, Kashipur, Samastipur .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gautam Bose,Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate and Mr Vikash Jha,Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) 4 19-02-2014 Upon hearing the writ petition, which has been made putting to challenge the order, dated 30.11.2011, passed, in O.A.No.409 of 2009, by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, what transpires is that the learned Tribunal has, at paragraph-10 of the impugned order, observed to the effect that the applicant (i.e. respondent herein) had asserted that she had not been spared from Samastipur for enabling her to join at Sonpur, the respondents (i.e. petitioners herein) in support of their contention that the applicant (i.e. respondent herein) had been spared from Samastipur, no
