Gyan Chandra Praksash v. Smt. Madhumalti
Case brief
What is this about?
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner. The High Court dismissed the miscellaneous appeal for default as defects had not been removed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3142 of 2013 In
Miscellaneous Appeal No. 682 of 2009 ====================================================== GYAN CHANDRA PRAKSASH, SON OF CHABBIL CHAND LAL, RESIDENT OF SAVITRI SADAN SARASWATI LANE, LOHANIPUR POST OFFICE KADAMKUAN, POLICE STATION KADAMKUAN DISTRICT PATNA .... .... Petitioner Versus SMT. MADHUMALTI, DAUGHTER OF LATE RAI RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINHA, WIFE OF GYAN CHANDRA PRASAD, RESIDENT OF PIRWATA HOUSE, PROPER ARRAH, DISTRICT BHOJPUR .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) 3 18-02-2014 None has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the above and considering the fact that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and that the defects have not been removed, we dismiss this MJC for default. (I. A. Ansari, J)
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
Shashi.
Gyan Chandra Praksash
Smt. Madhumalti
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court