The Patna High Court rejected a miscellaneous jurisdiction case. The Chief Justice held that since no specific direction was issued to the authority, the question of 'wilful disobedience' did not arise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5586 of 2013
In
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 5846 of 2011
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
Patna High Court MJC No.5586 of 2013 (2) dt.16-05-2014
2 / 2
For the Petitioners : Mr. Shashi Bhusan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent No. 1to 5 & 7to 9: Mr. A.N. Pandey, AC to SC-1 For the Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti, Advocate For the Respondent No. 10: Mr. Lalit Kishore, Sr. Advocate Binita Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Sanjeet/-
E. Sector Vikas Samiti and others
The State of Bihar
Mr. S. Sidharath
Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh
Mr. Adesh Tetarmar
Mr. Manu ji Maharaj
R.M. Doshit
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
