The Chief Justice rejected the writ petition contending no case for contempt was made out. The substantive cause of action was not adjudicated on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 5014 of 2013 In
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1112 of 2011 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17 of 2005
======================================================
Bihar Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad through its State Project Director, Shiksha Bhawan, Saidpur, Rajendra Nagar, Patna.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
Rajesh Pandey, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employee Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office at R-Block, Road No. 6, Bihar, Patna.
.... .... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Sanjeet/-
Bihar Shiksha Pariyojna Parishad
Rajesh Pandey
R.M. Doshit
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
