The Hon'ble Court held that since the order under the contempt petition was complied with during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner's prayer became infructuous, and the petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2548 of 2013 (2) dt.26-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2548 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1628 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioners Versus
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate
Mr. Ram Binod Singh, Advocate
Mrs. Smriti Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 26-03-2014 Counsel for the petitioners states that during the pendency of the contempt petition the order under contempt has been complied with. In the circumstances, prayer made in the application has become infructuous, which is, accordingly, disposed of.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
Rajesh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of when the impugned order has been complied with during its pendency.
Stone Crusher Udyog Society through Thakur Prasad Gupta
The State of Bihar through B. Pradhan
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
