The Patna High Court orally disposed of the petition declaring the prayer infructuous as the challenged order was complied with during the pendency of the contempt proceedings.
The prayer made in the application was found infructuous and the matter was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2545 of 2013 (2) dt.26-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2545 of 2013
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4011 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramesh Singh, son of Haribansh Singh, resident of Village Narayanpur, P.S. Chenari, District Rohtas (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Sri Sandeep Paundrik, the Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram (Bihar) 2. Sri Anil Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sasaram, District Rohtas (Bihar) (Up to 11.04.2013) 3. Sri Nalin Kumar, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sasaram, District Rohtas (Bihar) (From 12.04.2013) 4. Sri Nagendra Mishra, the Circle Officer, Chenari, District Rohtas (Bihar) 5. The State of Bihar .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 2 26-03-2014 Counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of the contempt petition the order under contempt has been complied with. In the circumstances, prayer made in the application has become infructuous, which is, accordingly, disposed of. (V.N. Sinha, J)
Rajesh/-
Ramesh Singh
Sri Sandeep Paundrik
Sri Anil Kumar
Sri Nalin Kumar
Sri Nagendra Mishra
State of Bihar
V.N. SINHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
