Disposed
Raj Nikhil v. Sweta Sinha
Patna HCMJC/2322/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The court directed a clerical correction of a date in an order within MJC No. 2322 of 2012, changing '16.02.2012' to '06.01.2012', delivered as an oral order.
What did the court decide?
Directed that the date 16.02.2012 in the order dated 11.03.2014 be read as 06.01.2012.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Patna High Court MJC No.2322 of 2012 (7) dt.27-03-2014
¶2
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2322 of 2012 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Raj Nikhil .... .... Petitioner Versus Sweta Sinha .... .... Respondent ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Onkar Nath For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI) |
|
| 7 | 27-03-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. |
| Considering the matter in its entirety, it is hereby directed | |
| that the expression, ‘16.02.2012’, appearing in the order, dated 11.03.2014, passed in M.J.C. No.2322 of 2012 ought to have been recorded as ‘06.01.2012’ shall stand corrected, and be henceforth readas ‘06.01.2012’ in the order, dated 11.03.2014. (I. A. Ansari, J) |
¶3
A.I./-
¶4
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Raj Nikhil
- respondent
Sweta Sinha
Coram
AI extract
I. A. Ansari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court