Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case dismissed as infructuous on the assurance given in the counter affidavit regarding the petitioner's statement in paragraph 18 of the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19028 of 2012 (2) dt.09-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19028 of 2012
====================================================== 1. Jogendra Sharma S/O Late Sukhdeo Sharma R/O Vill-Maharas, P.S.Salkhua, O.P.-Banma Etahri, Distt-Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Director General Of Police , Bihar, Patna 3. The District Magistrate , Saharsa 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Saharsa Null Null 5. The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.-Salkhua, Distt-Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pawan Kr. Mishra Gp22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER ***************
02. 09.01.2014 Taking into consideration the statement made in paragraph 18 of the counter affidavit, the writ application has become infructuous. It is dismissed, accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/-
Jogendra Sharma
The State Of Bihar
The Director General Of Police, Bihar
The District Magistrate, Saharsa
The Superintendent Of Police, Saharsa
The Officer-In-Charge, P.S.-Salkhua
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
