Allowed

Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC26 Mar 2014CR. MISC./4728/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of cheating, theft, and forgery under the IPC and IT Act. The court noted the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and that uncontroverted evidence suggested the informant was asked to deposit funds in a beneficiary's name, not the petitioner's. Release was directed upon furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to be released upon furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each.

Neeraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4728 of 2014 (2) dt.26-03-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4728 of 2014 ====================================================== 1. Neeraj Kumar S/O Shailesh Prasad Resident Of Village- Timbalpur, P.S.- Kako Pali, District- Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER 2 26-03-2014 Heard learned Sr. Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State. Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 420, 379, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 66 and 67 of the I. T. Act. One Deputy Collector of neighbouring State is the informant. It has been alleged that the informant was asked to deposit Rs. 80,000/- in one account of State Bank which was in the name of Aruna Devi and Kumar Amit.

¶3

Submission is that no amount was received in the account of petitioner and he was not the beneficiary. He has no

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4728 of 2014 (2) dt.26-03-2014

¶5

criminal antecedent. Uncontroverted submission is that Girija Prasad yadav has been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 21.3.2014 in Cr. Misc. No. 4971 of 2014 having graver allegation.

¶6

allegation.

¶7

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Rumpa Kumar, J. M. Ist Class, Patna in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S. Case No. 172 of 2013.

¶8

(Shyam Kishore Sharma, J)

¶9

avin/-

Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Congress Bhuiyan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Ramesh Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotan Ram @ Chhotan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bahadur Kanu Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar