Allowed

Uday Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 Feb 2014CR. MISC./43576/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition filed under Section 438 CrPC, the High Court at Patna granted relief to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case under the IPC, imposing standard bail conditions and undertakings.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, subject to bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties and compliance with specified undertakings.

Uday Singh Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43576 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Uday Singh S/o Sri Mokhtar Singh R/o Berui, P.SBaniyapur, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. C. Jawahar, APP. =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶3

02. 14.02.2014

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶5

State.

¶6

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Considering the genesis and counter-version of the occurrence as also the fair antecedents of the Petitioner, let the Petitioner, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case No. 157 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43576 of 2013 (2) dt.14-02-2014

¶9

¶10

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶11

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶12

Vikash/-

Uday Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Uday Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Singh @ Rakesh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Bindeshwar Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Polay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Toni Bharti @ Toni Kant Bharti Vs The State Of Bihar

Khelawan Mahto and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nunu Lal Risideo and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar