This oral order granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners apprehending arrest in a Section 364 IPC case. The court fixed specific conditions including a trial appeal and surrender timeline.
Granted anticipatory bail on furnishing of bond and undertaking on conditions of appeal, attire and conduct in trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36611 of 2013 (04) dt.14-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36611 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Nunu Lal Risideo, son of Faudi Risideo 2. Shivanand Risideo, son of Faudi Risideo 3. Bhumi Risideo, son of Bokai Risideo 4. Chandar Risideo, son of Mangal Risideo All resident of Village-Rampur South, Police Station-Forbesganj, Distt. Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
04 14-02-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the
State.
The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the vague allegation against the petitioners who are of fair antecedents, it is ordered that in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioners, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Forbesganj P. S. Case no.19 of 2012, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, subject to the conditions as laid down under sections 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36611 of 2013 (04) dt.14-02-2014
That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioners, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioners. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the Petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioners are not accused in any other case and, if they are, they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the Petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the Petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the Petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
Vikash Verma/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail in a case instituted under Section 364 IPC against the petitioners apprehending arrest?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nunu Lal Risideo and others
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
