The Patna High Court denied the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a case instituted under the Excise Act, noting that incriminating articles were recovered from his house.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43542 of 2013 (2) dt.17-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43542 of 2013
====================================================== 1. Rajendra Kurail, son of Late Choudhary Kurail, resident of VillageKurail Tola, P.S.- Barari, District - Katihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 17-02-2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 47-A of the Excise Act. Considering that incriminating articles were recovered from the house of the Petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in connection with case no. C-1-29/2013 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
JA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether privilege of anticipatory bail should be extended to the petitioner in a case under Section 47-A of the Excise Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajendra Kurail
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
