Allowed

Mukesh Kumar Rai and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jan 2014CR. MISC./40394/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court released the petitioners, brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the deceased, on anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 304B, 201, and 34 of IPC, allowing four weeks for arrest or surrender upon furnishing specific bail bonds and guarantees.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail within four weeks of arrest or surrender subject to bail bonds and conditions.

Mukesh Kumar Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40394 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== 1. Mukesh Kumar Rai Son of Sri Pradeep Rai 2. Chanchal Kumari Wife Of Sri Mukesh Kumar Rai, both Resident Of Village- Gopalpur, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali At Hajipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3 27-01-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

Considering that the Petitioners are the brother-in-law and the sister-in-law of the deceased and claim to have been living separately, let the petitioners above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Bidupur P.S. case No.101 of 2013 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40394 of 2013 (3) dt.27-01-2014

¶5

¶6

Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶7

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶8

Narendra/-

Mukesh Kumar Rai and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Rai and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Naryan Lal Das @ Narayan Das and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Kant Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Nathuni Singh Vs The State Of Bihar