Allowed

Krishna Kant v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jan 2014CR. MISC./37949/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act. Bail was granted subject to an amount deposit, security, and specific undertaking conditions regarding identity, implications, and trial attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to depositing balance bill and bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties.

Krishna Kant Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37949 of 2013

¶2

===================================================

¶3

Krishna Kant Son of Ravindra Sharma R/o Hospital Road Opposite Panti Tanki, P.S.-Hajipur Nagar, District-Vaishali.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶8

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶9

03. 27.01.2014

¶10

Counter-Affidavit filed today be kept on record.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶12

State.

¶13

The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 135 of the Electricity Act.

¶14

Considering that the Petitioner undertakes to deposit the rest of the legitimate bill raised by the Electricity Department and he has deposited a sum of Rs. 1,20,943/- on 21.01.2014, let him be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 456 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37949 of 2013 (3) dt.27-01-2014

¶16

¶17

subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶18

Vikash/-

¶19

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

Krishna Kant v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Kant v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Naryan Lal Das @ Narayan Das and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mukesh Kumar Rai and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Nathuni Singh Vs The State Of Bihar