mean that the Court should forget to exercise their powers so as to forcing production of the witnesses which are duly vested in them by the Cr.P.C. One of such power is contained in Section 309 Cr.P.C. and the other is contained in Section 170(2) Cr.P.C. As per Section 170(2) Cr.P.C. every officer-in-charge of the police station by which a particular case has been investigated into, has to produce the witnesses before the court to support the charge, if he appears acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case. Thus, the statutory duty is cast upon the police to produce the witnesses in sessions trial or in any trial. In order to forcing the police to produce the witnesses what this Court feels is that the trial courts should pass order directing the officer-in-charge of that particular police station to produce the witnesses on day to day basis for their evidence during trial and for that purpose the Court must also annexed the list of witnesses to be produced before it for compliance. In case, the witnesses are not produced, the trial court must exercise its powers under Section 309 Cr.P.C. to impose heavy cost upon the State directing its realization from the officerin-charge of the particular police station. This procedure has been pointed out at a couple of times by me in different orders and I believe that if any trial judge acts as per law, then there may not be any reason for not producing the witnesses. I recommend to the
