Allowed
Surendra Kumar @ Munna Singh and Anr. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Patna HCCR. MISC./29871/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Cr.Misc. No.29871 of 2014 (2) dt.27-08-2014…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29871 of 2014 (2) dt.27-08-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.29871 of 2014
====================================================== 1. Surendra Kumar @ Munna Singh Son of Jitendra Kumar 2. Sarat Kumar alias Kakku Son of Surendra Singh alias Munna Singh Both r/o Mohalla Mungeriganj, P.S. Town Thana, District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Kumar Sanjay son of Late Anil Kumar Mahraj Both r/o Mohalla Mungeriganj, P.S. Town Thana, District Begusarai .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 2 27-08-2014 This application has been filed for restoration of Cr. Misc. no. 1326 of 2011 which stood dismissed for non-compliance of the order dated 20.6.2014. It is submitted that due to engagement and indisposition of the learned counsel for the petitioners, no one appeared in this case and this case stood dismissed for default. Considering the facts and circumstances, Cr. Misc. no. 1326 of 2011 is restored to its original file. This application stands allowed. (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) sudip/U T
Surendra Kumar @ Munna Singh and Sarat Kumar alias Kakku
The State of Bihar and Kumar Sanjay
Amresh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court