In a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking anticipatory bail, the High Court of Patna observed that given the nature of the accusation and recovery of counterfeit notes, it was not inclined to grant relief. The court dismissed the petition.
Application for anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23410 of 2014 (3) dt.03-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23410 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -214 Year- 2013 Thana -DHAKA District-
EASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI)
====================================================== Md. Talib Ansari @ Md. Talib son of Serajul Ansari, resident of VillageChainpur Dhaka, P.S. Dhaka, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Zaki Haider, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 3 03-09-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 489(b)(c) of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 214 of 2013. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated owing to political rivalry as he has not been named in the F.I.R. nor in the confessional statement of other co-accused. 4. Having regard to the nature of accusation and the recovery of the counter-feit notes, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Section 489(b)(c) IPC, wherein the petitioner claims false implication?
Whether the recovery of counter-feit notes and the nature of accusation justify denying anticipatory bail despite claims of political rivalry and non-naming in the FIR?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Talib Ansari @ Md. Talib
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
