The Patna High Court dismissed an anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner, who alleged false implication regarding an elopement case involving Sections 363, 366A, and 34 of the IPC, rejecting the plea due to specific accusations and the victim's age.
The bail petition stood dismissed; no privilege of anticipatory bail was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23573 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2013 Thana -BIRPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== 1. Deepak Paswan son of Sakaldeo Paswan, resident of village- Rani Patti, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Birpur, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
2 02-09-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23573 of 2014 (2) dt.02-09-2014
2
against the petitioner and the age of the victim girl, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 363, 366A, and 34 of the IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Paswan
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
