In an anticipatory bail petition, the High Court of Patna dismissed the plea, holding that the nature of the accusations and the gravity of the offence did not warrant granting relief.
Plea for anticipatory bail dismissed with no privilege granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23237 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -297 Year- 2013 Thana -BIRPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Bambhola Singh, Son of Late Jiya Lal Singh, Resident of Village - Shivnagar, P.S. - Balua Bazar, District - Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 16-10-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23237 of 2014 (3) dt.16-10-2014
2
pointing out from para- 34 thereof that the petitioner was not found when the police made attempts to make verification from him. Moreover, witness Ganesh Prasad Singh and witness Indradeo Singh at paras- 21 and 23 have supported the prosecution case.
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest for offences under Sections 420, 120B, 34 IPC and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bambhola Singh
The State of Bihar
VIKASH JAIN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
