The single judge bench dismissed the petition for anticipatory bail. The applicants, accused in a murder case, argued false implication and lack of eyewitnesses. The court rejected the petition citing the gravity of the offence and a history of absconding by the petitioners.
The petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.23325 of 2014
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -350 Year- 2009 Thana -MADHEPURA District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== 1. Md. Yunush Son of Late Md. Zakiruddin
All Resident of Village - Mahesua, P.S.- Madhepura (Bharrahi O.P.), District - Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER
3 15-10-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23325 of 2014 (3) dt.15-10-2014
2
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail for the offences alleged in PS Case No. 350 of 2009.
Md. Yunush
Md. Halim
Md. Saud
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
