Allowed

Md. Karimullah @ Karimullah v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC14 May 2014CR. MISC./21478/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No. 21478 of 2014, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under multiple sections of the IPC, imposing strict conditions regarding bailors, prior cases, and representation, while directing the trial court to expedite witness production.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding representation and witness production expedited by the trial court.

Md. Karimullah @ Karimullah Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 21478 of 2014

¶2

=================================================== Md. Karimullah @ Karimullah, Son of Late Hazi Maniruddin, Resident of Village-Samda, P.S.-Ratanpura, District-Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶3

The State of Bihar.

¶4

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶5

14.05.2014

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶7

State.

¶8

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶9

The Petitioner was refused bail by order dated 18.03.2013 but had been granted liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Certified copy of framing of charge has been produced before the Court which may be kept on record.

¶10

Considering the same, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge-II, Supaul in connection with Ratanpura P.S. Case No. 25 of 2012 (S.Tr. No. 222 of 2013) subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21478 of 2014 (2) dt.14-05-2014

¶12

¶13

relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶14

The Trial Court is directed to send a list of the witnesses fixing specific dates for production of the witnesses along with a copy of this order to the Superintendent of Police, Supaul who shall ensure production of the witnesses on the date so fixed by the Trial Court so that there is no further delay in trial.

¶15

Vikash/-

¶16

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

Md. Karimullah @ Karimullah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Karimullah @ Karimullah v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shamim Ahmad and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Nirmal Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Papu Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Munna Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Birendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Loki Ram Vs The State Of Bihar