Petition filed challenging an order of taking cognizance under Sections 323, 498(A) and 504 IPC. Court dismissed the matter as withdrawn based on counsel's statement of compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18322 of 2013
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18322 of 2013 (2) dt.30-06-2014
2/2
The application is filed challenging the order taking cognizance under Sections 323, 498(A) and 504 of the Indian Penal code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has been compromised and he does not want to prosecute this case any further.
This application is, thus, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
Jagdish/-
U T
Raghwendra Suman S/O Late Jitendra Choudhary, Rinki Devi W/O Raghwendra Suman, Sukanya Devi W/O Late Jitendra Choudhary, Dharmendra Suman @ Dharmendra Prasad Ch
The State Of Bihar, Rashmi Kumari @ Dolly W/O Shri Amrendra Suman, D/O Shri Vijay Kumar Rai
Ashutosh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
