In Criminal Miscellaneous No.17363 of 2013, the Patna High Court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application filed as a second revision under section 482 CrPC. The court held the application was not maintainable under section 397(3) CrPC.
The criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed as not maintainable in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17363 of 2013
| ====================================================== Murlidhar Pandey son of Late Kameshwar Pandey, resident of Village - Rupauli, P.S. Patori, District - Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Nageshwar Singh son of Late Ram Bahadur Singh 3. Jai Prakash Singh @ Lutan Singh S/O Late Harekrishna Singh Both resident of village - Ramgama Kamal, P.S. Patori, District - Samastipur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 07-05-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The present application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the petitioner in the form of second revision which is barred under section 397(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In that view of the matter, the application is not maintainable in law. Accordingly, it is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) |
Md.S./-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a second revision under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is maintainable.
Whether to allow the criminal miscellaneous application.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Murlidhar Pandey
The State of Bihar
Nageshwar Singh
Jai Prakash Singh
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
