The High Court of Patna dismissed a second revision application under Section 482 CrPC as impermissible in law, holding no order was passed below to revise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17493 of 2013
====================================================== Nirmala Devi W/O Rajesh Choubey, resident of village Bhagauna, P.S. Sathi, District West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Jitendra Sah S/O Bishwanath Sah, resident of village Bhagauna, P.S. Sathi, District West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-05-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is in the form of second revision which is not permissible in law. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Jagdish/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a second revision application under Section 482 CrPC is permissible in law.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nirmala Devi W/O Rajesh Choubey
The State of Bihar
Jitendra Sah S/O Bishwanath Sah
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
