Allowed

Prashant Kumar Paswan @ Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jun 2014CR. MISC./13852/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court released the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties in a case alleging elopement of an 18-year-old girl, where the petitioner claimed prior intimacy and stated she was residing happily with him post-marriage.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Prashant Kumar Paswan @ Sumit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13852 of 2014 (2) dt.16-06-2014

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13852 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -318 Year- 2013 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== 1. Prashant Kumar Paswan @ Sumit Kumar Son Of Bhudeo Paswan Resident Of Village-Madhopur, P.S. Nath Nagar, District-Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Indeshwari Pd.Mandal, Addl.P.P. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Addl.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER ------------- 2 16-06-2014 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been brought to the court through a complaint against six persons including the petitioner. The complaint being referred to police resulted in FIR under Sections 366A and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to elopement of complainant’ s daughter. She is alleged to be of 16 years of age. Submission is that the petitioner was intimated with the victim from before. The victim has been assessed to be of 18 years at the time when her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded. She in her statement before the court has stated that she had gone according to her own

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13852 of 2014 (2) dt.16-06-2014

¶4

will as there was affairs between them and after marriage with the

¶5

petitioner she is residing happily.

¶6

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned court, Bhagalpur in Nath Nagar P.S.Case No. 318 of 2013.

¶7

(Shyam Kishore Sharma, J)

¶8

Tahir/-

¶9

U T

Prashant Kumar Paswan @ Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant Kumar Paswan @ Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mustafa Vs The State Of Bihar

Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Usha Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Mistri Vs The State Of Bihar