Allowed

Md. Kalam @ Kallu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 May 2014CR. MISC./13661/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to a petitioner charged under Section 395 IPC in a supplementary FIR where the only material was a co-accused statement, subject to strict conditions including fortnightly hazari reports.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to fortnightly hazari reports and affidavit-based conduct conditions.

Md. Kalam @ Kallu Vs The State Of Bihar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13661 of 2014

¶2

====================================================== 1. Md. Kalam @ Kallu Son Of Late Samsuddin, Resident Of Village Mabaiya, P.S. Baisi, District- Purnea .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ram Pravesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party : Mr. Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶3

3 19-05-2014

¶4

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶5

State.

¶6

This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 395 of the Penal Code.

¶7

The first information report is against unknown persons. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is neither any recovery from the possession of the petitioner nor he has been put on test identification parade and the only material against the petitioner is the confessional statement of the coaccused. However, the petitioner has got three cases to his credit for offence under Section 395 and allied sections of the Penal Code.

¶8

Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Supplementory Baisi P.S. Case No. 84 of 2004 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner, who will file affidavit to the effect that the petitioner shall not indulge in such activity further and if he indulges, then,

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13661 of 2014 (3) dt.19-05-2014 2/2

¶10

the deponent must inform the Court about the indulgence of the petitioner and the Court below, itself, shall proceed to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and the petitioner shall file hazari in the nearest Police Station once in fortnight for six months and if any criminal activity of the petitioner is pointed out, then, the trial Court shall proceed for cancellation of the bail bond.

¶11

(Gopal Prasad, J)

¶12

SA/ T

Md. Kalam @ Kallu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Kalam @ Kallu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintu Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar

Rishi Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar

Tarkeshwar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar