Allowed

Rinku @ Sinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2014CR. MISC./13539/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to a female petitioner apprehending arrest in a criminal case involving multiple IPC sections. The order stipulated conditions regarding bailors, undertaking not to be an accused elsewhere, and attendance requirements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bond with two sureties, subject to specified conditions regarding attendance and affidavits.

Rinku @ Sinku Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13539 of 2014

¶2

=================================================== Rinku @ Sinku Devi W/o Binod Yadav Resident of Village Nakatpura, Police Station Bihar, District Nalanda.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 01.05.2014 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner,

¶4

Informant and the State.

¶5

The Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 448, 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Considering that the Petitioner is a lady without going into the veracity of the allegations, let her be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 430 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13539 of 2014 (2) dt.01-05-2014

¶8

¶9

bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give

¶10

an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if she is she shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after her release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶11

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶12

Vikash/-

Rinku @ Sinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rinku @ Sinku Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Singh Vs State of Bihar and CBI

Ranjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mohim @ Mohim Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Afsana Perveen @ Afsana Veen Vs The State Of Bihar