Allowed

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2014CR. MISC./11032/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge orally granted anticipatory bail to a cancer patient apprehending arrest in a Sections 304B IPC case, imposing conditions including a medical condition affidavit, police paper attendance, and trial appearance.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail subject to a bond of Rs. 5,000 with sureties and specific undertakings regarding medical condition, police attendance, and trial participation.

Lalita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 11032 of 2014

¶2

=================================================== Lalita Devi W/o Amaresh Kumar Singh Resident of Village Rampur Pratappur, Police Station- Awatar Nagar, DistrictSaran.

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶4

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ===================================================

¶5

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶6

02. 01.05.2014

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶8

State.

¶9

The Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 304B and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Considering that the Petitioner is suffering from cancer, let her be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Awatar Nagar P.S. Case No. 53 of 2008 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11032 of 2014 (2) dt.01-05-2014

¶12

¶13

relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶14

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶15

Vikash/-

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Singh Vs State of Bihar and CBI

Ranjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mohim @ Mohim Vs The State Of Bihar

Rinku @ Sinku Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Afsana Perveen @ Afsana Veen Vs The State Of Bihar