Allowed

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 May 2014CR. MISC./13378/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to Petitioner No. 1, apprehending arrest under Sections 376/511 IPC. The application of Petitioner No. 2 was dismissed as he had already been arrested. Bail was granted subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of like amount each, subject to specific conditions.

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 13378 of 2014 ====================================================== 1. Ram Pravesh Singh Son of Late Raghunandan Singh. 2. Sunil Singh Son of Late Raghunandan Singh Both R/o VillageBharakur, P.S. Aurangabad, and District-Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 01.05.2014 The case has been taken up for out of turn hearing

¶2

The case has been taken up for out of turn hearing because the daughter of the Petitioner No. 1 is to be married on 9^th May, 2014 as per the invitation card annexed with the Supplementary-Affidavit.

¶3

It has been submitted that the Petitioner No. 2 has been arrested and, therefore, his application has become infructuous.

¶4

The application is dismissed with regard to Petitioner No. 2 as having become infructuous.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 376/511 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Considering that there is no direct allegation against the Petitioner No. 1 of having attempted to commit rape, let the Petitioner No. 1, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13378 of 2014 (2) dt.01-05-2014

¶8

¶9

the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Aurangabad Mufassil P.S. Case No. 220 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶10

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶11

Vikash/-

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Pravesh Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manjeet Singh Vs State of Bihar and CBI

Ranjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Mohim @ Mohim Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Rinku @ Sinku Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Afsana Perveen @ Afsana Veen Vs The State Of Bihar