Petitioners failed to appear to press the criminal miscellaneous petition. The High Court dismissed the petition due to non-prosecution as no one appeared on their behalf.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.11507 of 2012
Versus
3 15-04-2014 On call, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners
either to press the petition or to make a prayer for adjournment. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of informant/ opposite party no. 2 is present.
The petition stands dismissed due to non -prosecution.
(Rakesh Kumar, J)
Praful/-
Amit Kumar Sahay @ Amit Ranjan
Sudama Patel
Mithu @ Srikant
The State of Bihar
Sambhu Nath Mishra
Rakesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
