In a mercy jurisdiction oral order, the Patna High Court disposed of a contempt application, noting that final orders by opposite parties existed, granting liberty to challenge in appropriate proceedings.
Application disposed with liberty to challenge in appropriate proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3484 of 2011 (9) dt.04-12-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3484 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Subheshwar Mishra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Union Of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghib Ahsan |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 9 | 04-12-2013 Since the final orders have been passed by the opposite |
| parties, this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the | |
| petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law in an appropriate proceeding. |
|
| (Jayanandan Singh, J) |
Arvind/-
Subheshwar Mishra
The Union Of India & Ors
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
