The petition was dismissed as not pressed for want of appearance by the petitioner's counsel, despite a claim regarding settlement and payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6910 of 2007 (5) dt.13-12-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6910 of 2007 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Singh & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga9) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mr. R.C.L.Das Mr. Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 5 13-12-2013 This matter is running on the list since last many weeks and was called out also. However, learned counsel did not appear to assist this Court and today also he is not present. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the claims of the petitioner have already been settled and the insured amount has been paid to him by the respondent no.7. However, since learned counsel for the petitioner is not present to press this application, the same is dismissed as not pressed.
(Jayanandan Singh, J)
Arvind/-
Sunil Kumar Singh & Ors
The State Of Bihar & Ors
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
