The petitioner withdrew the revision application. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Application dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.988 of 2011 (2) dt.23-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.988 of 2011
| ====================================================== Arvind Prasad .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s |
|
|---|---|
| 2 | ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the |
| petitioner does not want to press this application. | |
| Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not | |
| pressed. | |
| (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) | |
| Bhard | waj/- |
Arvind Prasad
The State Of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
