The Patna High Court, in Criminal Revision No. 1015 of 2012, reviewed an order by the Additional Sessions Judge rejecting the petitioners' prayer to remit the record to the Chief Judicial Magistrate under CrPC Section 228(1). Finding no illegality, the court dismissed the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1015 of 2012 (3) dt.24-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.1015 of 2012
====================================================== 1. Chandan Kumar. 2. Karu Saw. Both are sons of Luro Saw. 3. Chandan Kumar son of Upendra Saw 4. Bablu Saw son of Hardeo Saw. 5. Hira Devi wife of Buchhu Saw. All are residents of Zila Punarwas, P.S.-Matihani, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Parties ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER
3 24-01-2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 06.08.2012 passed in Sessions Trial No. 387 of 2012 arising out of Matihani P.S. Case No. 138 of 2010 by the court of Additional Sessions Judge, (Adhoc) No. Vth, Begusarai, whereby the Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) rejected the prayer of the petitioners to remit back the record to the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 228 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
On perusal of the impugned order, apparently, I find no illegality. Accordingly, this criminal revision stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
Safik/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the prayer to remit the record to the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 228(1) CrPC is illegal.
Whether there is any illegality in the impugned order refusing remittal of the record.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chandan Kumar
Karu Saw
Chandan Kumar
Bablu Saw
Hira Devi
State Of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
