Dismissed

Satyendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jun 2013CR. MISC./9752/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order dismissed two anticipatory bail petitions filed under Criminal Miscellaneous Nos. 6052 and 9752 of 2013. The petitions arose from an FIR regarding the recovery of foreign liquor from petitioners' thatched shops. The bench rejected the prayer for bail due to the nature of the case and allegations made. (Note: In the provided text, Section 272 and 273 of IPC relate to liquor-related

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 600 of 2012 was rejected.

Satyendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6052 of 2013 (6) dt.21-06-2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6052 of 2013
======================================================
1. Sudhir Singh S/O Bindeshwari Singh
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9752 of 2013
======================================================
1. Satyendra Rai S/O Sitab Rai
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
6 21-06-2013 Both the above stated anticipatory bail petitions arise
out of Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 600 of 2012 registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 188, 272, 273 of the Indian
Penal Code and 47 A of the Excise Act and accordingly, both the
above stated anticipatory bail petitions are being disposed of by
this common order.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioners are named in the first information report
and it is evident from perusal of the first information report that in
huge quantity foreign liquors were recovered from the respective

¶3

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6052 of 2013 (6) dt.21-06-2013

¶4

thatched shops of the petitioners and the name of petitioners came on the place of occurrence.

¶5

Although, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that aforesaid thatched shops do not belong to the petitioners nor petitioners have any criminal antecedent but considering the nature of the case as well as allegation levelled against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with the above stated Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 600 of 2012 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur is, hereby, rejected.

¶6

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶7

SHAHZAD/-

Satyendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyendra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sakaldeo Yadav and Ors. Vs State of Bihar

Md. Azhar Vs The State Of Bihar

Rabindra Kumar Rai @ Rabindra Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Chunni Lal Pd.Sah @ Chunilal and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar

Sudhir Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Neti Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar