Allowed

Srikant Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2013CR. MISC./5456/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Srikant Rai, in a case instituted under Sections 302, 201, and 379/34 IPC. The order mandated a bond, specific conditions regarding bailors, periodic police reporting, and undertakings regarding trial attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail in connection with Case No. 16 of 2010, subject to conditions including bond, specific bailors, police reporting, and trial attendance.

Srikant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5456 of 2013 ====================================================== Srikant Rai, S/O late Vidya Rai, Resident Of Village Koraiya, P.S. Mahuawara, District East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. For the State : Mr. Pradeep Narayan Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 4 05-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

¶2

offence under Sections 302, 201 and 379/34 Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The Petitioner is not named in the First Information Report. Subsequently, the Police spy reported that the Petitioner was using the Motorcycle of the deceased but the same has not been recovered from his possession.

¶4

Considering the aforesaid, let the Petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Ghorasahan (Jitna) P.S. Case No. 16 of 2010 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5456 of 2013 (4) dt.05-04-2013

¶6

2/3

¶7

bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other shall be the brother-in-law of the Petitioner namely, Deepak Kumar. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶8

In view of the antecedents of the Petitioner, the Petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Motihari, East Champaran, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next one year. The conduct of the Petitioner will be kept

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5456 of 2013 (4) dt.05-04-2013

¶10

3/3

¶11

under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the Petitioner before the court concerned.

¶12

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶13

S.Ali

Srikant Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Srikant Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramashish Bind and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Ram @ Binod Baitha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bilash Sahni and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar