Allowed

Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Apr 2013CR. MISC./4865/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged with an offence under Section 494 IPC. The court noted the petitioner was not named in the FIR, had not undergone a T.I.P., and there was no recovery from his possession. Bail was allowed subject to specific conditions regarding sureties and undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each or fixed by court below, subject to conditions.

Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.4865 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== 1. Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav, son of Govind Yadav, resident of VillageMatihani Tola Kichiniya Tar, Police Station- Mohanpur, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3/ 05-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶4

State.

¶5

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 494 Indian Penal Code.

¶6

Considering that the Petitioner is neither named in the First Information Report nor has he been put on Test Identification Parade and there has been no recovery from his possession, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/-(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court below to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati at Gaya, in connection with Barachati (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No.418 of 2012, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4865 of 2013 (3) dt.05-04-2013

¶8

2 / 2

¶9

bailor shall be Upendra Yadav, elder brother of the Petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶10

JA/-

¶11

(Anjana Prakash, J)

Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Yadav @ Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramashish Bind and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Ram @ Binod Baitha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bilash Sahni and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Srikant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar