The Patna High Court dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous No.3721 of 2009 as it was taken as an oral order when the petitioner had no instruction and the CBI submitted the petition became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3721 of 2009 (4) dt.23-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3721 of 2009
======================================================
Anupam Kumar Sharma @ Anupam Kumar
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union Of India Thru. CBI.
.... .... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Pandey
For the Opposite Party/s C.B.I. : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE
SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
4 23-10-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
no instruction whereas the learned counsel representing C.B.I.
submits that the petition has become infructuous.
This application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Shyam Kishore Sharma, J)
avin/-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
nullReferred
Anupam Kumar Sharma @ Anupam Kumar
The Union Of India Thru. CBI.
Shyam Kishore Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
