Petitioner informed the court that a compromise discussion is ongoing and he does not wish to proceed. The criminal miscellaneous petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34051 of 2011 (5) dt.11-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.34051 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Sudhir Kumar Singh S/O Bisheshwar Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Chaudhary Vidyanand Roy S/O Late Chaudhary Ram Bilas Ray .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 5 11-04-2013 It is informed on behalf of the petitioner that a talk of compromise is going on between the parties and the dispute of the parties is likely to be settled and, accordingly, petitioner does not want to proceed with this petition. In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/-
Sudhir Kumar Singh
The State Of Bihar
Chaudhary Vidyanand Roy
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
