High Court of Patna granted bail to the petitioner accused of kidnapping under Sections 363/366 of IPC, citing false allegations supported by victim statements noting voluntary marriages, directing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32451 of 2013
====================================================== Dipak Kumar Rai @ Dipak Kr. Ray, S/o Premchand Ray, resident of village- Parsadi, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 02-08-2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32451 of 2013 (2) dt.02-08-2013
2
(Vikash Jain, J)
P.K./-
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on bail considering the victim's statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
Whether the allegations of kidnapping are false given the victim's claim of voluntary marriage.
What conditions must be imposed for the petitioner's bail release.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dipak Kumar Rai @ Dipak Kr. Ray
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
